Corona Scandal: Biggest Fraud Case in Humankind's history
The present corona crisis must be renamed to the corona scandal, and those responsible for this lie must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages. Likewise, humanity must create safeguards to ensure no person will ever be in a position of power to defraud or manipulate humankind again. For these reasons, an international team of lawyers is arguing the most significant tort case ever: the corona fraud scandal. These crimes against humanity were first defined during the Nuremberg trials after World War II when the world community served justice to the Third Reich war criminals. Today, crimes against humanity are regulated in section 7 of the International Criminal Code.
There are three predominate questions in the context of a judicial approach to the corona scandal:
1. Is there a corona pandemic, or is there only a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test pandemic? Specifically, does a positive PCR test result mean that the person tested is infected with COVID-19, or does it mean absolutely nothing connected with the COVID-19 infection?
2. Do the so-called anti-corona measures, such as the lockdown, mandatory face masks, social distancing, and quarantine regulations, serve to protect the world’s population from corona, or do these measures serve only to make people panic?
3. Is it true that the German government was massively lobbied more than any other country, by the chief protagonists of this so-called corona pandemic? Dr. Christian Drosten, virologist and Director of the Institute at Charité Hospital in Berlin; Mr. Lothar Wieler, veterinarian and head of the German equivalent of the CDC, the RKI; and Mr. Tedros Adhanom, head of the World Health Organisation or WHO, because Germany is known as an exceptionally disciplined country and was therefore to become a role model for the rest of the world - for its strict and of course successful adherence to the corona measures?
First, healthcare systems were never in danger of becoming overwhelmed by COVID-19 because many hospitals remain empty to this day; some are even facing bankruptcy. Further, the hospital ship Comfort, which anchored in New York at the time and could have accommodated a thousand patients, never accommodated more than 20 patients.
In New York, only some, but by far not all, hospitals were overwhelmed. Many people, most of whom were elderly and had severe pre-existing medical conditions, raced to the hospitals because of the panic mongering. Had it not been for the panic mongering, most of these people would have just stayed home to recover. However, many of them fell victim to healthcare-associated infections or nosocomial infections, malpractice incidents, or being put on a respirator rather than receiving oxygen through an oxygen mask. Studies carried out by Professor Ioannidis have shown that corona’s mortality is equivalent to that of the seasonal flu. Even the pictures of New York that were used to demonstrate panic were proved to be deliberately misleading.
Further, a leaked paper from the German Department of the Interior showed that the population was deliberately driven to panic by politicians and mainstream media. The accompanying and irresponsible statements of the head of the RKI (the German CDC) shows that he followed the paper’s script verbatim. He continuously asserted that the situation was very grave and threatening in his public comments, although the figures compiled by his own institute proved the exact opposite. Among other things, this “panic paper” erroneously called for children to be made to feel responsible for the painful, tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow the corona rules.
Again, to clarify, COVID-19, this is the current state of affairs, is a dangerous disease. Of course, COVID-19, just like the seasonal flu, may sometimes take a severe clinical course and occasionally kill patients. But, forensic scientist Professor Klaus Püschel performed autopsies and found that almost all been caused by extreme pre-existing conditions, and virtually all of the people who had died, died at an old age, meaning they had lived beyond their average life expectancy.
Interestingly, the German RKI initially recommended that no autopsies be performed. There are numerous credible reports that doctors and hospitals worldwide had been paid money for declaring a deceased person a victim of COVID-19 rather than writing down the actual cause of death on the death certificate, for example, a heart attack or a gunshot wound. Without the autopsies, we would never know that the overwhelming majority of the alleged COVID-19 victims had died of entirely different diseases but not of COVID-19.
Consequentially, based on information learned from the hearings conducted with the Corona Committee and from other data that has become available in the meantime, the assertion that the lockdown was necessary because 1) there were so many different infections with SARS-CoV-2, and 2) the healthcare systems would be overwhelmed is wrong, for three reasons.
1. The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating. By the time the lockdown was set, the alleged infection rates were already dropping again.
2. There’s already protection from the virus because of cross, or t-cell, immunity. This is remarkably true for coronavirus family viruses. Even if the body is infected with a different coronavirus than before, its immune system remembers every virus it has previously battled.
Incidentally, that’s how the PCR test for detecting an infection was invented by the now infamous Professor Drosten. At the beginning of January of 2020, Drosten developed his PCR test without ever seeing the real COVID-19 but only learning from social media reports something was happening in Wuhan.
Drosten used an old SARS [severe respiratory syndrome] virus, hoping it would be sufficiently similar to the allegedly new strain of the coronavirus found in Wuhan, and sent his results to China to determine whether the alleged new coronavirus victims tested positive. They did, and that was enough for the WHO to sound the pandemic alarm and recommend the worldwide use of the Drosten PCR test to detect infections with the virus now called SARS-CoV-2.
Drosten’s opinion and advice was the only source for the German government when it announced the lockdown, as well as the rules for social distancing and the mandatory wearing of masks. Consequently, Germany became the center of massive lobbying by the pharmaceutical and tech industry.
3. Finally, the most critical fact: the PCR test is being used based on false statements, not based on scientific facts concerning infections. We learned PCR tests, contrary to the assertions of Messrs, Drosten, Wieler, and the WHO, do not give any indication of an infection with any virus, let alone an infection with SARS-CoV-2
PCR tests are expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is noted on leaflets coming with these tests and emphasized by Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR tests. Instead, they’re simply incapable of diagnosing any disease. Contrary to Drosten, Wieler, and the WHO’s assertions, a positive PCR test result does not mean that an infection is present. If someone tests positive, it does not mean that they’re infected with anything, let alone with the contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus. Even the United States’ CDC agrees with this, as noted from page 38 of one of its publications on the coronavirus and the PCR tests dated July 13, 2020.
Per the CDC, first, the detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of an infectious virus or that 2019 nCoV [novel coronavirus] is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. Second, this test’s performance has not been established for monitoring the treatment of a nCoV infection. Third, this test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
Also, it is still unclear whether there has ever been a scientifically accurate isolation of COVID-19. Therefore, it could easily be true that nobody knows what we’re looking for when we test, especially since this virus mutates quickly.
During a PCR test, the testing swab takes one or two sequences of an invisible molecule, so the sample needs to be amplified numerous times in many cycles. Everything over 35 cycles is, as reported by the New York Times and others, considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable. However, the Drosten test and the WHO recommended tests that followed his example are set to 45 cycles.
Further, these tests cannot distinguish between inactive and reproductive matters, meaning a positive result may happen just because the test detects a molecule fragment from a past common cold.
In an interview with a German business magazine in 2014, even Drosten declared that even with an alleged detection of a MERES infection, these PCR tests are so highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive. In my view, it is utterly implausible that he forgot in 2020 what he knew in 2014. In short, this test cannot detect any infection, contrary to all false claims stating that it can. Therefore, this means a positive test result means nothing.
Meanwhile, several highly respected scientists worldwide assume that there has never been a corona pandemic but only a PCR testing pandemic. This is the conclusion reached by many German scientists such as Professors Bhakdi, Rice, Mölling, Hockerts, Wallach, and many others, including Professor John Ioannidis and the Nobel laureate, Professor Michael Levitt, from Stanford University. The most recent opinion is Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president, and chief science officer at Pfizer, who held this position for 16 years. He and his co-authors, all well-known scientists, published a scientific paper in September of 2020, and he wrote a corresponding magazine article on September 20, 2020.
Among other things, he stated, “We’re basing our government policy, our economic policy, and the policy of restricting fundamental rights presumably on completely wrong data and assumptions about the coronavirus. If it weren’t for the test results that are constantly reported in the media, the pandemic would be over, because nothing really happened.”
Regarding the all-important PCR tests, Yeadon wrote an article titled ‘Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics - the Deadly Danger of False Positives’ where he stated, “…The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89 to 94 percent or near certainty…” Dr. Yeadon, in agreement with numerous professors of immunology, explicitly notes that a positive test does not mean that an intact virus has been found.
The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is partial RNA sequences, which could be a piece of dead virus, incapable of making the subject sick and being transmitted to anyone else.
Further, Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan, Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, writes that the COVID-19 virus would never disappear if this testing practice continues, but would always be falsely detected. Lockdowns, as Yeadon and his colleagues found out, do not work.
For example, Sweden, with its laissez-faire approach, and Great Britain, with its strict lockdown, have entirely comparable disease and mortality statistics. The same was found by US scientists concerning the different US states; it makes no difference to disease incidence, whether a state implements a lockdown or not.
Now, let’s look at the current actual situation regarding the severe damage caused by the lockdowns and other measures. Another official German paper in the Department of the Interior was leaked recently and is now called the False Alarm paper. It concludes that there was, and is, no sufficient evidence for serious health risks for the population, as claimed by Drosten, Wieler, and the WHO. Yet, the author says there’s very much evidence of the corona measures causing gigantic health and economic damage to the population, which he then describes in detail in this paper. This, he concludes, will lead to remarkably high claims for damages, which the government must be held responsible for. The paper’s author was suspended.
Increasingly, scientists and lawyers recognize that because of this deliberate panic-mongering, democracy is in great danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
For example, in Australia, people who do not wear masks or wear them incorrectly are arrested, handcuffed, and thrown into jail. In the Philippines, they run the risk of getting shot. Still, even in Germany and in other previously civilized countries, children are taken away from their parents if they do not comply with quarantine regulations, distance regulations, and mask-wearing regulations.
Let me summarize the legal consequences. The most challenging part of a lawyer’s work is establishing the real facts. Unfortunately, German lawyers do not learn this in law school, but their Anglo-American counterparts get the necessary training at their law schools. A court can only decide a legal dispute correctly if it has previously determined the facts precisely, which is impossible without looking at all the evidence. Based on the facts summarized above, legal evaluation is actually simple.
Let’s first take a look at the unconstitutionality of the measures. Several German law professors, including Professors Kingreen, Morswig, Youngblood, and Foskarau, have noted these measures are without a sufficient legal basis and are therefore unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately.
Likewise, judge Torsten Schleife publicly declared that the German judiciary has been so panic-stricken that it could no longer administer justice properly. He says that the courts of law “have all too quickly waved through coercive measures which for millions of people all over Germany represent massive suspensions of their constitutional rights.” He points out that German citizens “are currently experiencing the most severe encroachment on their constitutional rights, since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949, to contain the corona pandemic.” “Federal and state governments have intervened massively,” he says, “and are threatening the country’s very existence, as it is guaranteed by the people’s constitutional rights.”
What about fraud, intentional infliction of damage, and crimes against humanity? Based on criminal law rules, asserting false facts concerning the PCR tests may be the fraud crime of intentional misrepresentation. Likewise, in civil tort law, this translates into intentional infliction of damage. The German Professor of civil law, Martin Schwab, has supported this assertion in interviews and in a comprehensive 180-page legal opinion. He has familiarized himself with the subject matter like no other and provided a detailed account of the mainstream media’s complete failure to report on the actual facts of this so-called pandemic.
He argues that, based on their expertise, their institutions’ expertise, Messrs, Drosten, and the WHO knew that the PCR tests cannot provide any information about infections. Still, they repeatedly asserted to the general public that they can. Further, they knew that the world’s governments would decide on lockdowns, social distancing rules, and mandatory mask-wearing based on these tests.
Under civil tort law rules, all those harmed by these PCR tests and lockdowns are entitled to receive full compensation for their losses. In particular, there is a duty to compensate and pay damages for the loss of profits suffered by companies and self-employed persons due to the lockdown and other measures.
How can we do something? What can we do?
Well, a class-action suit is the best route to compensatory damages and to political consequences. The advantage of the class action is that only one trial is needed: to try the complaint of a representative plaintiff who is affected in a manner typical of everyone else in the class. This makes class-action suits cheaper and faster.
Suppose an American or Canadian company or individual decides to sue these persons in the United States or Canada for damages. In that case, the court resolving this dispute may, upon request, allow this complaint to be tried a class-action lawsuit. If this happens, affected parties will be informed and have the opportunity to join this class action. It should be emphasized that nobody is required to join, but every injured party can join the class action.
Further, the well-established and proven Anglo-American law of evidence, with its pre-trial discovery, will apply. This requires that all evidence relevant for the determination of the lawsuit is put on the table. In contrast to the typical situation in German, the withholding or destruction of evidence is not without consequence - party withholding or destroying evidence loses the case under American evidence rules.
In Germany, a group of tort lawyers has banded together to help clients recover damages. They have provided all relevant information and forms for German plaintiffs to estimate how much damage they have suffered and joined the group or class of plaintiffs who will later join the class action when it goes forward either in Canada or the US.
Initially, this group of lawyers had also considered collecting and managing the claims for damages of other non-German plaintiffs, but this proved to be unmanageable. However, through an international lawyers’ network, which is growing larger by the day, the German group of attorneys provides to all of their colleagues, in all other countries, free of charge, all relevant information, including expert opinions and testimonies of experts showing that the PCR tests cannot detect infections. They also provide relevant information so they can prepare and bundle damage claims so that they, too, can assert their clients’ claims for damages either in their home countries, courts of law, or within the framework of a class action, as explained above.
These scandalous corona facts gathered mostly by the corona committee and summarized above are the very same facts that will soon be proven to be accurate, either in one court of law or in many courts of law, all over the world. These are the facts that will pull the masks off the faces of all those responsible for these crimes.
To the politicians, who believe those corrupt people, these facts are offered as a lifeline to help you readjust your course of action and start the long-overdue public scientific discussion and not go down with those charlatans and criminals.